I think that world the net hard money was there? _real world_world money__Economy _Real economy, not criticism, is creating a new theory that should I for each world economy. _______

World Economy Collapse explained in 3 minutes






[I think that world the net hard money was there?




In the real world, the world has not worked with world money. For example, when comparing urban and rural, more money is likely to he city. Compared to developed economies and developing countries, more money, of course former life. There is no doubt about such differences.

I think the net is very low extent, but the idea. When reason and thought, born in the first place because of money, get a good reason to think I have played any role.

Money was born to break the limitations of barter. The era of barter, trading goods and services so that direct trade is viable and where to do so. Fishermen to take fish, rice farmers produce. Exchange directly. But these forms.But get going So many things for the inconvenience. Trade to substitute some money, how to record the deferred deposit transactions (bonds) to make a, time, location and size of the contents of the service to meet people, vulnerable to a variety of constraints .The result of that is money in such a natural.

In other words, the money that came to trade with both, unless you're directly facing, and make sure there is no need to bring into play the trading of trading is also no longer have to match the time and place of transaction or.

I owe it money. Only by eliminating these constraints, but the role of money. However, Web is that they've been resolved without such limitations of money. Easily find and meet people to trade (search engine, SNS, an auction). And easy exchange of information goods and services. Of course, not bound by time and place as well.

So, I think that the world does not need the money first. In the real world, but no money is great and convenient. Products and services just something that money had not been born.
Meanwhile, on the web, without money you would not mind. So, even where the money [we] I do not need so much I could not come to me in that. Well, what the web world are boring, and of course that does not say. Difficult to say whether life is worth the world, but rather the opposite. Even without money, to rotate the economy developing world. I think it is a web. It is different economies at all. Economy or rather, they are very different economic principles. So I do not need the money.

I have no money, I really do not rotate and economic value. Whole new world. Degree of capitalism and socialism, along with what this new world economy is not great either. Can receive services without using money. Information can interact. I'm great.

Not bound by time or place or person or object, and services. I'm a wonderful world. They are profitable internet [saying] I'll leave alone. They do not realize it was a new economic principles.Open source, Web services, search engines, mashups, participatory service. Help to make things more and more efficient in this new economy that these new trends. Web is just so different rules.
Need to apply the same force in this world is not the real world. We are proud of this unprofitable world, let us evolve. Of course, just because people can not live web, live in the world for real money is important to very important.


Real economy, not criticism, is creating a new theory that should I for each world economy.

リアル経済の批判でななく、それぞれの世界に適した経済を創っていけばいいという論です。